Archive for June, 2009

New Flu Vaccine Approved — for Dogs

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

There is a new flu virus going around. It initially looked quite lethal, and caused panic. Now it is clear that it has killed relatively few victims — and many of those have underlying conditions. It is particularly dangerous to be the possessor of a pushed-in nose — that is, to be a Pekingese, a pug or a Shi-Tzu.

It is the H3N8 dog flu. The virus, scientists believe, jumped from horses to dogs at least five years ago, but it has never infected a human.

Last week, the United States Department of Agriculture announced that it had approved the first vaccine for it.

While fears of a flu pandemic among humans have shifted from the lethal H5N1 avian flu to the relatively mild H1N1 swine flu, the H3N8 canine flu has been a quiet undercurrent in the United States, rarely discussed except among veterinarians and dog owners in the few areas where it has struck hard: Florida, New York City’s northern suburbs, Philadelphia and Denver.

In line with the virologists’ adage that the only predictable thing about flu viruses is that they are unpredictable, the dog flu has baffled those following it.

“I don’t think we know what this virus is going to do yet,” said one of its discoverers, Dr. Cynda Crawford of the University of Florida veterinary school.

When Dr. Crawford began studying it in January 2004, it had come to her notice as a mysterious cough and pneumonia that killed a third of the greyhounds at a Florida dog track. By the next year, she had found it in seven states and had shown that it could be passed by dogs who just rubbed noses on the street or shared a water dish, and that humans could carry it on their clothes. There was a brief flurry of fear that it would kill 1 percent to 10 percent of the country’s 70 million dogs.

It has proved about as deadly as Dr. Crawford predicted. She estimates that by itself, it kills 5 percent of the dogs that catch it. Add the deaths at shelters that eliminate the virus by killing all their dogs and disinfecting their cages, and the total mortality rate is 8 percent.

(By contrast, the mortality rate of the 1918 Spanish flu in humans was about 2 percent.)

But it has not spread nearly as vigorously as she expected. It has now been found in 30 states, but almost exclusively in settings where dogs live closely together: shelters, pet stores, kennels and dog schools. Because the owners of these establishments have learned to turn away sick dogs just as school principals facing swine flu send home sick children, the disease’s progress has been slowed.

“Probably over 10,000 dogs have been infected,” Dr. Crawford said, “but I can’t say whether it’s 20,000 or 30,000. In a population of 70 million, that’s a drop in the bucket.”

Dr. Edward J. Dubovi of the veterinary school at Cornell University, another discoverer of the virus, said it is “probably not as well adapted to dogs as it could be.” It took five mutations to let it jump to dogs from horses, where it had circulated for 40 years.

Another mutation or two “could make it a very serious issue,” he said, but at the moment, “it takes a certain density of dogs to keep it going.”

Some veterinarians have found that the dogs that tend to die from it are the “brachycephalics” — dogs with short snub noses.

Just as obesity has proved dangerous to human flu victims because of the weight on their chests, being bred to have a short, bent respiratory tract is dangerous for dogs.

“It really puts a strain on their ability to breathe,” Dr. Crawford said. “They can’t move air in and out of their lungs.”

Source

New Flu Vaccine Approved — for Dogs

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

There is a new flu virus going around. It initially looked quite lethal, and caused panic. Now it is clear that it has killed relatively few victims — and many of those have underlying conditions. It is particularly dangerous to be the possessor of a pushed-in nose — that is, to be a Pekingese, a pug or a Shi-Tzu.

It is the H3N8 dog flu. The virus, scientists believe, jumped from horses to dogs at least five years ago, but it has never infected a human.

Last week, the United States Department of Agriculture announced that it had approved the first vaccine for it.

While fears of a flu pandemic among humans have shifted from the lethal H5N1 avian flu to the relatively mild H1N1 swine flu, the H3N8 canine flu has been a quiet undercurrent in the United States, rarely discussed except among veterinarians and dog owners in the few areas where it has struck hard: Florida, New York City’s northern suburbs, Philadelphia and Denver.

In line with the virologists’ adage that the only predictable thing about flu viruses is that they are unpredictable, the dog flu has baffled those following it.

“I don’t think we know what this virus is going to do yet,” said one of its discoverers, Dr. Cynda Crawford of the University of Florida veterinary school.

When Dr. Crawford began studying it in January 2004, it had come to her notice as a mysterious cough and pneumonia that killed a third of the greyhounds at a Florida dog track. By the next year, she had found it in seven states and had shown that it could be passed by dogs who just rubbed noses on the street or shared a water dish, and that humans could carry it on their clothes. There was a brief flurry of fear that it would kill 1 percent to 10 percent of the country’s 70 million dogs.

It has proved about as deadly as Dr. Crawford predicted. She estimates that by itself, it kills 5 percent of the dogs that catch it. Add the deaths at shelters that eliminate the virus by killing all their dogs and disinfecting their cages, and the total mortality rate is 8 percent.

(By contrast, the mortality rate of the 1918 Spanish flu in humans was about 2 percent.)

But it has not spread nearly as vigorously as she expected. It has now been found in 30 states, but almost exclusively in settings where dogs live closely together: shelters, pet stores, kennels and dog schools. Because the owners of these establishments have learned to turn away sick dogs just as school principals facing swine flu send home sick children, the disease’s progress has been slowed.

“Probably over 10,000 dogs have been infected,” Dr. Crawford said, “but I can’t say whether it’s 20,000 or 30,000. In a population of 70 million, that’s a drop in the bucket.”

Dr. Edward J. Dubovi of the veterinary school at Cornell University, another discoverer of the virus, said it is “probably not as well adapted to dogs as it could be.” It took five mutations to let it jump to dogs from horses, where it had circulated for 40 years.

Another mutation or two “could make it a very serious issue,” he said, but at the moment, “it takes a certain density of dogs to keep it going.”

Some veterinarians have found that the dogs that tend to die from it are the “brachycephalics” — dogs with short snub noses.

Just as obesity has proved dangerous to human flu victims because of the weight on their chests, being bred to have a short, bent respiratory tract is dangerous for dogs.

“It really puts a strain on their ability to breathe,” Dr. Crawford said. “They can’t move air in and out of their lungs.”

Source

New Flu Vaccine Approved — for Dogs

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

There is a new flu virus going around. It initially looked quite lethal, and caused panic. Now it is clear that it has killed relatively few victims — and many of those have underlying conditions. It is particularly dangerous to be the possessor of a pushed-in nose — that is, to be a Pekingese, a pug or a Shi-Tzu.

It is the H3N8 dog flu. The virus, scientists believe, jumped from horses to dogs at least five years ago, but it has never infected a human.

Last week, the United States Department of Agriculture announced that it had approved the first vaccine for it.

While fears of a flu pandemic among humans have shifted from the lethal H5N1 avian flu to the relatively mild H1N1 swine flu, the H3N8 canine flu has been a quiet undercurrent in the United States, rarely discussed except among veterinarians and dog owners in the few areas where it has struck hard: Florida, New York City’s northern suburbs, Philadelphia and Denver.

In line with the virologists’ adage that the only predictable thing about flu viruses is that they are unpredictable, the dog flu has baffled those following it.

“I don’t think we know what this virus is going to do yet,” said one of its discoverers, Dr. Cynda Crawford of the University of Florida veterinary school.

When Dr. Crawford began studying it in January 2004, it had come to her notice as a mysterious cough and pneumonia that killed a third of the greyhounds at a Florida dog track. By the next year, she had found it in seven states and had shown that it could be passed by dogs who just rubbed noses on the street or shared a water dish, and that humans could carry it on their clothes. There was a brief flurry of fear that it would kill 1 percent to 10 percent of the country’s 70 million dogs.

It has proved about as deadly as Dr. Crawford predicted. She estimates that by itself, it kills 5 percent of the dogs that catch it. Add the deaths at shelters that eliminate the virus by killing all their dogs and disinfecting their cages, and the total mortality rate is 8 percent.

(By contrast, the mortality rate of the 1918 Spanish flu in humans was about 2 percent.)

But it has not spread nearly as vigorously as she expected. It has now been found in 30 states, but almost exclusively in settings where dogs live closely together: shelters, pet stores, kennels and dog schools. Because the owners of these establishments have learned to turn away sick dogs just as school principals facing swine flu send home sick children, the disease’s progress has been slowed.

“Probably over 10,000 dogs have been infected,” Dr. Crawford said, “but I can’t say whether it’s 20,000 or 30,000. In a population of 70 million, that’s a drop in the bucket.”

Dr. Edward J. Dubovi of the veterinary school at Cornell University, another discoverer of the virus, said it is “probably not as well adapted to dogs as it could be.” It took five mutations to let it jump to dogs from horses, where it had circulated for 40 years.

Another mutation or two “could make it a very serious issue,” he said, but at the moment, “it takes a certain density of dogs to keep it going.”

Some veterinarians have found that the dogs that tend to die from it are the “brachycephalics” — dogs with short snub noses.

Just as obesity has proved dangerous to human flu victims because of the weight on their chests, being bred to have a short, bent respiratory tract is dangerous for dogs.

“It really puts a strain on their ability to breathe,” Dr. Crawford said. “They can’t move air in and out of their lungs.”

Source

Dog pound conditions in Inuvik are deplorable, SPCA says

Monday, June 29th, 2009

The mayor of Inuvik, N.W.T., is defending the treatment of stray dogs at the town’s pound, while the local SPCA is asking police to lay animal cruelty charges against the town.

Linda Eccles, executive director of Inuvik’s Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, said she was shocked to see the state of the pound when she and two RCMP officers checked on it on June 17.

“The ammonia smell in there was so strong it burns your eyes,” Eccles told CBC News.

“The animals were very stressed, and they were living in very filthy conditions.”

Eccles took pictures of the dogs, which were surrounded by their own excrement and chained to old oil tanks outside, with no water nearby.

‘Best dog pound above the Arctic Circle’: mayor
Eccles has asked the RCMP to lay animal cruelty charges against the town.

Mayor Derek Lindsay, however, said the town is doing what it can to care for stray dogs.

“We have probably the best dog pound above the Arctic Circle,” Lindsay said.

“They are being very humanely treated, you know, considering some of the other communities in the Arctic do not pick up dogs and detain them for any period of time. They just shoot them on site.”

Lindsay said only rarely is a cleaning shift missed, and excrement piles up as a result.

“For God’s sakes, we’re not supplying hotels for them,” he said. “They don’t get room service. We feed them. We water them. They have adequate space.”

Dogs being euthanized
Last week, the town euthanized eight of the 10 dogs at the pound, in an effort to address crowding issues. Lindsay said the remaining two will be put down soon.

Eccles pointed out that putting down the dogs is not necessary, since Inuvik has a deal with the Calgary Humane Society to take the town’s stray dogs.

Calgary Humane Society spokeswoman Pamela Amos said it would have helped Inuvik take the dogs if the town had asked.

“If they do need our help … we would definitely extend that to them,” she said.

Lindsay said under an arrangement it has with Canadian North, the northern airline will only pay for one dog a month to be shipped to Calgary.

As for Eccles’ allegations, Lindsay said she is simply airing a personal grievance with the town, since she was fired as its animal control officer last year.

Source

July 1st & 4th Safety Tips For Dog Owners

Friday, June 26th, 2009

With the commotion and fireworks during the upcoming Canada Day and Independence Day holiday’s, here are some helpful tips for more than 43 million Canadain & U.S. dog owners on how to keep their dogs safe and calm.

“Independence Day celebrations are great fun for people, but the loud noises and bright lights can be traumatic for dogs,” said Gerard Raneri, Pima County dog behavioral therapist and trainer for Bark Busters USA. “A dog’s sense of hearing is acute—far more sensitive than human hearing—so fireworks explosions, excited voices and visual stimulation can leave your dog confused and afraid.”

“Animal shelters report that the July 4th holiday brings record numbers of terrified runaway dogs to their doors,” Raneri continued. “By being aware and thinking ahead, we can keep our dogs safe and make them as comfortable as possible during the revelry.”

Raneri offers the following tips for dog owners to prepare for Independence Day:
• If you are going to a fireworks display, leave your dog at home where he will be the most safe and comfortable. You might even consider hiring a pet sitter.
• If you do take your dog to a holiday event, never leave him or her in the car. Even if it is a relatively cool evening, a partially opened window does not supply sufficient fresh air, and it creates an opportunity for your pet to be stolen.
• Always keep proper identification securely fastened to your dog’s collar in case he gets out. If your dog isn’t micro-chipped, talk to your veterinarian about implanting one. If your dog is chipped, make sure that your veterinary clinic and the local Animal Care Center have your correct contact information in their database.
• Don’t leave your dog outside. If you cannot bring him inside, cover his dog house with a blanket to protect him from the bursts of bright lights and loud bangs.
• Create a special den-like area in your home where your dog feels safe. A properly introduced crate or kennel can be a calming refuge for him.
• If your dog is not already crate trained, DO NOT crate him on July 4th! It could lead to self destructive behavior.
• Some dogs become destructive when frightened. If you don’t use a crate, remove any items in the room which your dog could destroy or which could hurt him if he chewed them.
• Keep your dog away from the front and back doors. Dogs under stress can injure others or dart out the door and get lost.
• Keep windows and curtains closed to reduce noise and bright flashes.
• Turn on a TV or radio at normal volume to distract your dog from loud noises and help him to relax.
• If possible, stay with your pet during the majority of the fireworks. A dog often reacts more intensely to loud sounds and flashes of lights when you are not with him.

“These tips are just as useful during southern Arizona’s dramatic monsoon storms,” advised Raneri, “so apply them during any period when loud and unexpected noises and flashes of light may occur.”

Raneri stated, “July 4th is a time for fun and celebration. By taking these precautions, you and your dog can have a safe and happy holiday experience.”

Bark Busters dog behavioral therapists, such as Gerard Raneri, are recognized authorities in correcting and managing dog behavior. Bark Busters’ natural training system can successfully train any dog, even a puppy, by leveraging the same communications methods—body language and voice control—that dogs follow as part of their instinctual pack mentality. If Bark Busters clients continue with follow-up exercises just 10 to15 minutes a day for several weeks, many require only one home visit from a Bark Busters-certified dog behavioral therapist. All training takes place right in the home where the problems generally occur. And Bark Busters’ training is the only service of its kind that is guaranteed for the life of the dog. In every market where Bark Busters is established, a majority of veterinarians familiar with the technique recommend the company’s services.

Source – Bark Busters

About Bark Busters:

Bark Busters, the world’s largest, most trusted dog training company, started in Australia in 1989 and came to the United States in 2000. Since inception, over 500,000 dogs have been trained worldwide using its dog-friendly, natural methods. With approximately 250 franchised offices in 40 states and more than 400 offices in 10 countries, Bark Busters is continuing its mission to build a global network of dog behavioral therapists. The company’s goal is to enhance responsible dog ownership and reduce the possibility of maltreatment, abandonment and euthanasia of companion dogs. SPCA International selected Bark Busters dog behavioral training services as the “Best of the Best” in its category. No other training company or dog trainer has received such a distinction. To fetch a trainer in your area, call 1-877-500-BARK (2275) or in Pima County, visit Gerard Raneri’s website at www.BarkBustersTucson.com. Dog owners can complete an online Dog Behavioral Quiz to rate their dogs’ behavior.

How to Travel with Your Pet

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

Apricot had never been to Hawaii.

But like anyone, man or beast, who has ever visited the islands, the poodle sensed there was something very special about the place the moment his plane landed.

In this case, that special something was that he wasn’t supposed to be there.

Turns out the airline messed up and Apricot was never loaded onto a nonstop flight from Miami to New York’s JFK Airport, where his anguished owner, writer and lifetime traveler Lea Lane watched the luggage carousel lazily spin without her dog. Hours passed until a 3 a.m. phone call alerted her that the poodle was back in New York after the Hawaii detour. Once home, Apricot stared blankly and wouldn’t respond for hours. Lane never put him on a plane again.

This horror story took place about 25 years ago, and while airlines are more accountable today for the handling and tracking of pets checked as baggage or cargo, stuff still happens, and there’s a lot you can do to ensure your pet has a safer and happier experience if you decide to travel together.

“LoJack” Lassie

Back in Apricot’s day the notion of implanting a pet with a homing device was practically science fiction. Today it’s a simple procedure performed during a veterinary office visit. A microchip “only the size of a grain of rice is injected under the [pet’s] skin” without fuss or discomfort, says certified animal behavior consultant and author Darlene Arden. You must also register the chip with the manufacturer’s database, says Susan Smith, president of pettravel.com, so that animal control agencies can track it if your pet disappears. As always, your pet should be wearing an ID tag with his or her name and your cell number. And it’s smart to carry a recent photo of Fido with you should he disappear.

Arden suggests writing a letter from your pet to the pilot, something along the lines of “Hi my name is Rex. I’m flying with you in the cargo hold and my mom who’s in seat 23A is really worried about me, so can you make sure the cargo is pressurized and let my mom know that I’m safely on board?” Have a flight attendant deliver the note. Arden says that uniformly this trick has been effective for her and her clients because “the flight crew has gotten involved – a lot of them have pets – and they’ll come assure you that your pet is fine.” Also attach a photo of your pet to the letter and have two letters prepared if you’re changing planes, she says.

Coach or cargo?

If you’re flying with a cat or small dog, stowing it in its carrier under the seat in front of you is the most desirable option. Fido needs to stay put throughout the flight, so ensure the carrier “conforms to the shape of the seat without collapsing” or turning over, Arden says. You’ll need to make your pet a reservation – most commercial airlines limit the number of in-cabin pets to about seven per flight – as well as pay a fee upwards of $100, which the airlines charge, frankly, because they can.

You may also fly your pet as either checked baggage or cargo. The only difference between the two methods is how your pet is processed, Smith says, as all of them end up in the same pressurized, temperature-controlled storage space under the plane. Pets checked as baggage fly free and will be disgorged onto the luggage carousel at your destination. Cargo pets are usually charged by weight and sometimes also by the size of the animal carrier, and are dropped off and picked up at a special facility at your departing and arriving airports.

Some airlines don’t permit cabin pets and many will mandate you fly your pet as cargo if it’s anything other than a dog or cat, or if your pet or its carrier exceed a certain size. All pets must fly by cargo if they’re traveling without you. Consult your airline about its guidelines when you book.

Checked pets must be in ventilated International Air Transport Association (IATA) compliant carriers. Attach all your travel information to the crate, and provide ample food and water and some favorite toys. For dogs, line the carrier with a towel or newspaper in the event of accidents. Include a disposable litter box for cats. And while it used to be the norm, do not sedate your pet. Arden and Smith say tranquilizers slow an animal’s breathing, which can be particularly dangerous for airborne pug-nosed dogs.

Pack your papers

Have a vet examine your pet within ten days of your trip and issue you a health certificate. The airlines will ask to see it, especially if you’re transporting Fido by air cargo. Many hotels will also want to eyeball the document to verify Fido is flea, tick and disease free. All European Union countries and many other overseas destinations will require the certificate to bear a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) stamp, which you can obtain for a $45 fee at your local USDA office. Bone up on country requirements and leash laws, too, Smith says, because if you’re unprepared for “entry requirements in the country you’re visiting they will [potentially] quarantine your pet, send it back, or destroy it.”

Ask your vet what kind of preventative measures for fleas, ticks, heartworm, or mosquitoes might be appropriate for your destination. Arden suggests bringing sunscreen and aloe, especially for sun-sensitive hairless pets. Get referrals for vets in your destination and consider asking your vet where you might take a pet first aid class.

Treat your terrier like a toddler

If you’re hitting the highway, contain your pet as you would for air cargo, stowing it in the back of the car. Take bathroom breaks every two hours if motoring with a dog.

Perhaps the most important road rule, suggests frequent traveler Angela Berardino, who takes long road trips with her boxer, Ollie, is having your dog on its leash and having a firm grip on it before opening the car door.

“Even well-behaved pets can take off quicker than you realize. Traffic at rest stops can be confusing, or there may be other animals around you don’t immediately see. You should never be wrestling with attaching a leash in a parking lot,” she says.

Know what makes a hotel pet friendly.

Thousands of hotels nationwide welcome pets, says Smith. For years selected luxury hotels have pampered pets with amenities ranging from pet concierges and masseuses to specially-prepared meals and pet gift baskets.

But if you’re looking for a basic pet-friendly hotel, “ask if they accept pets in all their rooms or if there are only specific rooms” set aside for pet owners, Smith says, as many hoteliers will try to shove guests with pets into smoking rooms. Ask when you book what the safety deposit is (to cover potential damage and cleaning costs) and whether or not it’s refundable.

And inquire, Arden suggests, about whether you’re permitted to have you pet in the lobby, elevators, and other indoor and outdoor public areas.

Get Fido in the mood to travel

Conditioning your pet to travel before your trip is critical. If Spot or Felix don’t get out much at home, Smith says to “test your pet’s sociability, taking it “places like dog parks and [elsewhere] out of its environment and see how it reacts.” Take short car rides, perhaps initially with a friend in back, “to reassure [your pet] that the traveling by car is safe,” Berardino says.

Start keeping your pet in its carrier at your feet, recommend Lane and Arden, so that over time the carrier “becomes a fun place to be,” Arden says, and your pet doesn’t just associate the carrier or travel with going to the vet or groomer.

“No pet of any size should be relegated to simply that,” Arden says.

Source

Dogs Are Aggressive If They Are Trained Badly

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Many dogs are put down or abandoned due to their violent nature, but contrary to popular belief, breed has little to do with a dog’s aggressive behaviour compared to all the owner-dependant factors. This is shown in a new study from the University of Córdoba, which includes breeds that are considered aggressive by nature, such as the Rottweiler or the Pit Bull.

The conclusions, however, are surprising: it is the owners who are primarily responsible for attacks due to dominance or competition of their pets.

The research team from the University of Córdoba (UCO) has determined a series of external factors which are inherent to the dogs in order to understand their aggressiveness, and they have observed that external, modifiable and owner-dependent factors have a greater influence on the animals.

According to Joaquín Pérez-Guisado, the main author of the study and a researcher from the UCO, some of the factors that cause aggressiveness in dogs are: first-time dog ownership; failure to subject the dog to basic obedience training; spoiling or pampering the dog; not using physical punishment when it is required; buying a dog as a present, as a guard dog or on impulse; spaying female dogs; leaving the dog with a constant supply of food, or spending very little time with the dog in general and on its walks.

“Failure to observe all of these modifiable factors will encourage this type of aggressiveness and would conform to what we would colloquially call ‘giving our dog a bad education’”, Pérez-Guisado explains to SINC.

The study, which has recently been published in the Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, is based on the following fact: approximately 40% of dominance aggression in dogs is associated with a lack of authority on the part of the owners who have never performed basic obedience training with their pets or who have only carried out the bare minimum of training.

Breed has less influence on aggressiveness

The Spanish researchers studied 711 dogs (354 males and 357 females) of which 594 were purebred and 117 were half-breed dogs older than one year of age. Among the breeds observed were the Bull Terrier, the American Pit Bull Terrier, the Alsatian, the Boxer, the Rottweiler, the Doberman, as well as apparently more docile breeds such as the Dalmatian, the Irish Setter, the Golden Retriever, the Labrador Retriever, the Miniature Poodle, the Chihuahua, the Pekinese, or the French Bulldog, which also exhibit dominant behaviour.

According to Pérez-Guisado, certain breeds, male sex, a small size, or an age of between 5-7 years old are “the dog-dependent factors associated with greater dominance aggression”. Nevertheless, these factors have “minimal effect” on whether the dog behaves aggressively. Factors linked to the owner’s actions are more influential.

To correct the animal’s behaviour, the owner should handle it appropriately and “re-establish dominance over the dog”, the researcher adds. In terms of physical punishment, Pérez-Guisado points out that “this method cannot be used with all dogs given the danger involved, although it could be used to re-establish dominance over puppies or small and easy-to-control dogs”. However, “it should never be used as justification for treating a dog brutally, since physical punishment should be used more as a way to frighten and demonstrate the dominance we have over the dog than to inflict great suffering on the animal”, the vet states.

According to the researcher, “dogs that are trained properly do not normally retain aggressive dominance behaviour”. Pérez-Guisado attributes this “exceptional” conduct to the existence of some medical or organic problem, “which can cause changes in the dog’s behaviour”.

——————————————————————————–

Journal reference:

Pérez-Guisado, Joaquín; Muñoz-Serrano, Andrés. Factors Linked to Dominance Aggression in Dogs. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 2009; 8 (2): 336-342

Source

Family Pets May Harbor MRSA, Other Nasties

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

New Research Points to Dogs, Cats as Possible Carriers of the Deadly Superbug

The nasty, drug-resistant bacteria known as MRSA may have a new carrier: the family pet. The scourge of hospital wards and locker rooms, MRSA often begins with small red bumps that can turn into painful abscesses requiring surgery to drain them.

If not detected and treated, they can find their way into the body, causing infections in heart valves, lungs, joints, bones and the bloodstream.

Yes, Kitty and Spot may be boon companions, but their friendship comes with the possibility of the transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and at least 30 other pathogens, according to Dr. Richard Oehler and his colleagues at the University of South Florida College of Medicine in Tampa.

Many of these bugs are transmitted by bites and scratches, but others — such as MRSA — can cycle back and forth between pets and owners, Oehler and his colleagues warned in a review article, which appears in the July edition of the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases.

“Pet owners are often unaware of the potential for transmission of life-threatening pathogens from their canine and feline companions,” the researchers said.

Particularly worrisome is a growing body of evidence that cats and dogs can be colonized by MRSA — germs that are probably acquired from their owners, since cats and dogs usually carry a different strain of Staphylococcus bacteria.

But the cats and dogs can give the bug back. As long ago as 1988, researchers reported that a cat living in a United Kingdom geriatric unit had passed MRSA back to people. Screening of patients and staff showed that 38 percent of the nursing staff there had colonies of the bacteria living somewhere on them.

And that’s not uncommon, according to Lawrence McGill, a veterinarian at the ARUP Animal Reference Pathology Laboratory in Salt Lake City, Utah.

“There is more and more data pointing to the [fact that the] most common source for animal infections with MRSA is from humans, including contact with medical facilities where humans are treated,” McGill said.

In 2006, researchers isolated MRSA from the skin sores of a three-year-old domestic short-haired cat and — for the first time in a household pet — confirmed the pathogen as belonging to the infamous strain known as USA300.

The USA300 clone is a major source of skin infection in community-acquired MRSA in the United States — and the owner of the cat had indeed experienced repeated soft-tissue staphylococcal infections.

The treatment of infections from pets is the same as for MRSA acquired from other sources, Oehler said. Mild-to-moderate infections can be treated with oral anti-staphylococcal agents, while more serious disease can be treated with drugs injected into the sites of infection.

But MRSA is not the only potential bacterial threat that pets can harbor. All told, at least 30 pathogens can be transmitted from pets to people, Oehler and his colleagues said, including species of Pasteurella, Streptococcus, Fusobacterium and Capnocytophaga.

Many are transmitted by bites and scratches, the researchers said, noting that in 2001, more than 350,000 Americans were treated in emergency departments for non-fatal dog-bite-related injuries.

In the U.S., dog and cat bites make up about 1 percent of emergency room visits every year, and the numbers are similar in Europe.

Roughly 60 percent of animal bites are by dogs; the cost to treat them exceeds $1 billion per year. Between 10 and 20 percent of animal bites are attributed to cats.

Severe infections can occur in about 20 percent of all dog and cat bites, the researchers said.

When bitten, hands are the most parts of the body to develop infections, as well as to develop rapidly spreading and disabling damage. In fact, between 30 and 40 percent of these hand bites become infected.

But pet lovers need not worry about handling their pets, as spreading the germ in this way is relatively rare.

“Petting or handling pets will not result in infection very easily,” McGill said, adding that keeping pets clean, maintaining immunizations and controlling parasites “will go a long ways to keeping the pet and owner healthy.”

Source

By MICHAEL SMITH
MedPage Today Staff Writer

Dogs in China

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

Dogs take on new role in China as pets

The Chinese have a supremely ambivalent relationship with dogs.

They still like to eat them in winter because it is good for the blood. They also consider them to be vermin and cull them on a semi-regular basis.

And, recently, a growing number of newly affluent urbanites like to keep cute little puppies as pets.

It means that when you see a dog, even in sophisticated Shanghai, it’s not always clear whether you’re looking at dinner, a rabid cur or man’s best friend.

Aside from birds, turtles and fish, keeping pets has never been a Chinese tradition. Even before Mao Zedong’s running dogs of imperialism vilified the species and enriched the political lexicon, China’s canines were primarily hunting dogs and farm dogs — not lapdogs.

Xiao Yumei works in Pet Family grooming salon in Shanghai’s leafy French Concession. When the salon set up shop in 1998, she barely had enough customers to stay open. But each year more and more people began keeping pet dogs and business just kept getting better. By 2006, it was so good a slew of competitors moved into the neighbourhood and cut into her trade, however, and it’s levelled off.

Xiao’s customers are mostly older people with little dogs. “People in this neighbourhood live in old apartments which are not big enough for big dogs,” she explains.

Many are grandparents who have spent their retirement raising their single grandchild and for a second time in their lives find themselves empty nesters.

The idea of grooming a dog is new to many of Xiao clients, but they’re taking to it enthusiastically.

“Our service includes showers, clipping and dye jobs,” Xiao says. “Our hair dye service is basic, we can’t colour a dog like a panda bear,” she laughs. “Usually we just dye a dog’s ears, tail or part of the body. Pink and orange are the favourite colours.”

She confides, however, that one client wanted her Schnauzer clipped and primped into a Shih Tzu.

Move the scene away from Xiao’s very smelly dog salon to Hanzhong city, 1,200 plus kilometres away in Shaanxi province, and no longer is the concern whether to dye your dog purple or blue; the worry is where to hide it, and, if that’s not possible, how to kill it.

Claiming 300 people had been bitten by stray dogs recently and that two have died of rabies, officials slaughtered an estimated 36,000 dogs last month. Even licensed pet owners were bluntly told to kill their own pooches or pay the military $18 to do it for them.

Although dog culls were an almost annual event in China from 1949 to 1976, and there were several reports of dog roundups in Beijing prior to last year’s Olympic Games, there hasn’t been news of a slaughter on the scale of the Shaanxi cull in nearly three years — and the flak has been heavy, by Chinese standards.

The central government responded by promising to publish a draft law by the end of the summer outlining its plans to protect animals, including measures prohibiting abusing and abandoning pets. It didn’t mention whether killing dogs for food will be affected, but it is unlikely.

As another one of the dog measures put in place prior to last summer’s Games, dog meat was banned from menus at restaurants around the capital. It wasn’t much of a hardship for anyone, however, since dog stew and other canine delicacies are winter fare for the Chinese and clearly seen as too rich for the blood during a steamy Beijing summer. By the time the weather cooled, the Olympics were a memory and dog meat was back on the table.

There are no realistic figures available on how many pet dogs there are in Shanghai, let alone China. They just don’t exist. Officials cite the number of licenses sold, but since most people don’t buy one, it’s a meaningless statistic.

In Shanghai’s middle-class Luwan district, the neighbourhood committee has already experimented — with little success — with things like poop-and-scoop rules and a ban on dog-walking during rush hour, but it remains hopeful and is ready to try even more intrusive measures to deal with the growing number of dogs barking in the night.

The committee is now calling for a public hearing before issuing each dog license. Essentially, the five closest neighbours must agree before any applicant can legally adopt a pooch.

“It is a good way to reduce conflicts caused by pet dogs,” Luwan public security official Chen Mingjun optimistically told the Shanghai Daily.

Source

Aileen Mccabe

Dog Killings in China Spur Outrage

Friday, June 19th, 2009

Animal-welfare advocates complained about a campaign in which a local government has killed 37,000 dogs to fight a rabies outbreak, highlighting a divide in attitudes toward animals as China grows wealthier.

The city of Hanzhong, in China’s central Shaanxi province, has ordered the killing of all dogs found outside homes in areas hit hardest by the outbreak. Authorities have ordered “dog-beating teams” to canvass the area and beat dogs to death on the spot — including those that have been registered by their owners, said Shi Ruihua, head of the livestock department in Hanzhong’s agriculture bureau.

Rabies outbreaks are common in rural China. This year, Hanzhong saw a spike in the number of cases. Thirteen people have died there since the outbreak started in early March.

The Hanzhong dog cull, which began May 23, appears to be one of the largest such episodes in recent years. It has triggered outrage, expressed largely online, from the growing cohort of dog lovers. Internet portals and chat sites in China have carried much discussion, as well as photographs and video, of the cull.

“Killing dogs is not the appropriate way to control the spread of rabies,” said Jeff He, a special assistant at the International Fund for Animal Welfare in China. Noting China has been trying without success since the 1950s to eradicate rabies by culling dogs, Mr. He said it would be better to increase funding for vaccination programs and to raise public awareness about rabies and related animal-care issues.

Mr. Shi said it was necessary to cull dogs within three miles of the most infected areas of the city, and beating them to death was determined to be the most practical option. He said the city also ordered the vaccination of 360,000 dogs in the surrounding countryside at government expense.

The number of rabies infections of humans in the city has decreased since the program started, he said. “Dogs are human beings’ friends when they are healthy, but once they are infected they do harm to people’s health,” Mr. Shi said. “Human beings’ lives are more important.”

Source